Saturday, January 4, 2020
Han and Roman Views on Technology - 1065 Words
ââ¬Å"Han and Roman Views on Technologyâ⬠The Hans and Romans understood the importance of technology, but unlike the Hans, the Romans viewed anyone who worked with tools or with their hands to be a person of lowly status. The Romans only showed appreciation for technologies that could hold some benefit for the upper-class. The upper-class Romans thought that craftsmen, people who made a living out of making tools, was hardly an occupation that deserved any respect. The Hans appreciated the use of tools in their labor and how it could help the people. The Hans showed a great appreciation of their technological advancements, and its effect on society. The Roman attitude toward technology was that any person who worked in workshops, devotingâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦These tools are also sold at very high prices considering their low quality. The Han government has dominated the trade of iron, controlling the quality of tools used by the people to do work, and the quality of tools the government uses to perform its public duties, such as repair work and the building of public structures. All the previous documents used above were all in the perspective of an upper-class citizen. An additional document that would have shown the attitude of the lower-class citizens and the womenââ¬â¢s perspective of these technological achievements would have added authenticity to this argument. A document from the perspective of an upper-class woman in Roman or Han society would show if new technologies affected their everyday work/obligations, or if technologies were solely for the benefit of men. Another source that would have been helpful would be from a lower class woman to show the similarities and differences of the work expected of lower class and upper-class women. Men were dominate in both Roman and Han societies, but the attitude that the lower class men had of technology was excluded from the list of documents provided. The documents consisting of the feelings of the upper class citizens in the Han and Roman societyââ¬â¢s states that people of the lower class used too ls to perform their work, but it is unknown how they personally felt about technology and its affect on them. From the informationShow MoreRelatedHan and Roman Dynasty View on Technology903 Words à |à 4 Pagesunderstanding that both the Han and Roman empires thought of technology as useful and somewhat revolutionary, but both of them had somewhat different feelings of it. The Han dynasties attitude toward technology was that they thought it was very benefical, and they admired it. The reason this was because they though it to be very helpful in agriculture and construction purposes. Evidence of the positive effects of this can be seen in Document 4: History of the Early Han Dynasty which tells of a governerRead MoreHan and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology Essay618 Words à |à 3 Pagesthe documents, analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology. Identify one additional type of document and explain briefly how it would help your analysis. The Han and Roman Empires were extremely important empires during the time of their existence. The Han Empire began around 206 BCE and ended at around 220 CE. The Roman Empire began at around 27 BCE and broke apart into two halves, the West falling in 476 and the East collapsing in 1453. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire have differentRead MoreSimilarities Between The Han And Roman Empire1027 Words à |à 5 Pages The Han and Roman empire were both built with the hard work of the laborers. The laborers being the common people of the Empire. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire had different outlooks on how the common folk influenced their societies technology. The Romans thought lowly of their common people, thinking they were not as smart as the people in upper class. While in the Han Dynasty the upper class were grateful of the work the people did and knew that the common people was the base ofRead MoreHan And Roman Perspective Of Technology1375 Words à |à 6 Page sHan and Roman Perspective of Technology The Han and Roman people were two different societies during the classical period. The documents highlighted Han and Roman attitudes towards technology. The Han documents displayed excerpts from itââ¬â¢s people that explain how the Han people relied on technology daily and respected the inventors of the technology. The Roman documents portrayed the Romans weak reliance on technology, however they do emphasize a beauty to the aesthetic side of technology. Han Chinaââ¬â¢sRead MoreHan And Roman Attitudes Towards Technology1411 Words à |à 6 PagesThe Han and Romans attitudes towards technology resembled each other in a variety of ways like how both empires allowed non-government workers to practice engineering and other crafts that dealt with technology. However, during the first century of B.C.E the Han and Roman empires had many differences with their attitudes towards technology. For example, the Roman empire was against engineering and advancements in technology as it had g overnment officials speak out against engineering and being aRead MoreAncient Rome And The Han Dynasty In China1279 Words à |à 6 Pages During the Classical Period, Ancient Rome and the Han Dynasty in China were two prospering civilizations. On one hand, there was Ancient Rome, which was a civilization in the Mediterranean area that had been able to last about one-thousand years. Ancient Rome was also considered to be one of the most influential civilizations. The Han Dynasty on the other hand lasted four-hundred years and instead of being the most influential society, the Han Dynasty was one of the most prominent and distinguishedRead MoreRoman Empire And The Han Dynasty810 Words à |à 4 PagesThe Roman Empire and the Han dynasty both have created inventions that have inspired the modern world, and created impressive innovations and processes that advanced their primitive societies in the ancient world. Both civilizations worked tirelessly to create innovative solutions to the problems they had, or to advance their cities in a way they felt could not be replicated. Each city had their own view on how these inve ntions should be created and ran. The Romans created aqueducts and inventedRead MoreComparative Look At The Roman Empire And Han Dynasty Economies Essay1409 Words à |à 6 Pages A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT THE ROMAN EMPIRE AND HAN DYNASTY ECONOMIES Scott Hosier History 111: World Civilization Before 1650 December 27, 2016 ââ¬Æ' The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty had simple economies--when compared to current global economies--founded on agriculture, mining, trade, and taxation. Although those economies were straightforward it allowed civilizations to grow and eventually collapse. However, the two civilizations had drastically different methodologies on the exchange ofRead MoreEssay on Cross Cultural Exchanges on the Silk Road Networks1643 Words à |à 7 PagesSilk was an important item that was traded and began during the Han Dynasty. The Silk Road was a network of trade routes and the first marketplace that allowed people to spread beliefs and cultural ideas across Europe and Asia. Merchants and traders of many countries traveled technologies, diseases and religion on the Silk Road; connecting the West and East. They also imported horses, grapes, medicine products, stones, etc. and deported apricots, pottery and spices. The interaction of these differentRead MoreByzantine Empire vs China1272 Words à |à 6 PagesPostclassical Period. This period, within the year 500 CE and 1450 CE, was built up by ââ¬Å"third-wave civilizationsâ⬠. In other words, it was built up by large empires characterized by constant patterns of change, trade, and considerable changes in technologies. In 1492 CE these civilizations got global, meaning that the interactions among these different societies stopped being regional. Two empires who were very important during the Postclassical Period were the Byzantine Empire and China. Geographically
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.